• Home
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Travel
  • Events
  • Classifieds
  • More
    • Editor’s Note
    • Book Reviews
    • Education
    • Health & Home
    • History
    • Art & Music
    • Point of View
    • Rubrique Francaise
    • Science
    • Technology
    • The Bridge
    • Videos

Advertisement
TAN Book

Taxing Savers Is Not The Solution To Canada’s Economic Woes

on December 1st, 2021 by The Afro News 0 comments

Advertisement
TheAfroNewsBook

Governments have to stop giving in to political pressures and focus instead the consequences of their economic policies for Canadian families

Now that the federal election is over, several financial sector experts and economists are turning their attention to the Trudeau government’s promise to raise the corporate income tax rate for banks and insurance companies from 15 per cent to 18 per cent.

But while attacking these financial giants can pay off politically, the fact is that these measures will instead have the effect of penalizing Canadian families and savers.

Governing based on electoral motives rarely generates the hoped-for economic results, especially when we’re talking about raising tax rates for a key sector of our economy that determines in part the retirement incomes of millions of Canadians.

Indeed, while the image of a banker with a glass of scotch in one hand and a Cuban cigar in the other, sitting atop his tower in downtown Toronto, may capture the popular imagination, it is worth our while to ponder just where these financial institutions’ profits end up.

In Canada, the performance of many public pension plans depends in part on the increase in the value of the shares of Canadian banks and insurance companies. For example, the Canada Pension Plan holds substantial assets in the financial sector year after year. Thus, when the profits of these financial institutions are artificially reduced by a tax increase, it is all savers who suffer.

In other words, millions of Canadians are indirectly shareholders of our banks and share in their profits. That’s quite far removed from our imaginary stereotype of a rich banker.

Moreover, although there are few charter banks in Canada due to the current regulatory framework, the financial sector remains highly competitive. Just think, for instance, of the frequent promotions offered by financial institutions, or of the permanent reduction in various fees, as we are seeing with the elimination of brokerage fees by certain banks.

But it’s clear that the sector will not be able to remain as competitive if new fiscal and regulatory obstacles are thrown in its path. And it is consumers who will end up paying the price, through the potential increase in certain fees.

The Trudeau government justifies these new tax proposals by invoking the increased spending during the pandemic and the desire to augment federal government revenues. However, before considering increasing the tax burden borne by Canadian companies and individuals, policy-makers should instead look for ways to control public spending.

In barely five years, the federal debt has doubled in size, with the country recording deficits even in periods of economic growth before the pandemic. The solution must come from the spending side, not the revenue side.

After all, even if we add up all the new measures for increasing revenues presented in the federal budget (combined with the maximum revenues that could be collected thanks to a one-time wealth tax), it would take the federal government just a little less than sixteen days to spend these new revenues.

Populist political measures like raising taxes on banks and insurance companies usually only generate very superficial revenues for government, but they entail substantial costs for consumers and savers.

Our governments have to stop giving in to political and popular pressures and focus instead on the economic analysis of their public policies and their consequences for Canadian families, all while controlling spending to avoid shortchanging future generations.

By Miguel Ouellette

Miguel Ouellette is Director of Operations and Economist at the Montreal Economic Institute. 

Troy Media

TAN

Filed under: Business, Canadian News, Finance, Point of View, The Bridge Tagged With: Canada Pension Plan, Canadian banks and insurance companies, The Solution to Canada’s economic

Related Posts

  • We Really do Need an expanded Canada Pension Plan
  • There Are Several Reasons to Oppose CPP Expansion
  • If Governments Force Canadians to Save More for Retirement, Voluntary Private Savings Will Shrink
  • Pros and Cons of an Expanded Canada Pension Plan
  • Pensions for public sector out of whack

Next post: Jesus’ Empathy

Previous post: Food Supply Chain Resilience Put to The Test By B.C. Floods

Stay Informed
Sign Up To Get Your Weekly Roundup of the News
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing!Be sure to look for your confirmation email and confirm your subscription.

Advertisement

Advertisements

> Navigate Our Site

  • Book Reviews
  • Business
  • Editor’s Note
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Events
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Health & Home
  • History
  • Art & Music
  • Point of View
  • Rubrique Francaise
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • The Bridge
  • Travel
  • Videos

> Extra Resources

  • Advertising
  • Post a Classified Ad
  • TAN History
  • Letter to the Editor
  • SAGE Foundation
  • TAN Facebook
  • TAN Twitter
  • La Palabre Podcast
  • Writers Login
Back To Top

Copyright © ’2025’ The Afro News, a PGH company
All Rights Reserved